This is from the booklet The Inner Temple: A Brief Historical Description by J. H. Baker, K.C., LL.D., F.B.A. published in 1991 and some practices have changed since this booklet was published. For current practice see the Inn’s website.
The society occupied the Inn as tenants of the Knights Hospitaller until 1540, when the possessions of that order were vested in the Crown (32 Hen. VIII, c. 24). No pre-1540 leases have survived, and it may be that the Inn was held under some kind of informal tenancy at will; even after the society attorned to the Crown in 1540, no written lease appears to have been drawn up. In 1608 King James I conveyed the Temple in fee simple to the benchers of the two societies, ‘to serve for all time to come for the accommodation and education of the students and practitioners of laws of the realm’. The property was granted in free and common socage, to be held by fealty alone as of the manor of East Greenwich, for a rent of £10 a year from each inn. The freehold has since then been held by successive groups of benchers as trustees for the two inns. The rent was purchased from the Crown in 1675, subject to a life interest belonging to Queen Catherine of Braganza, and was finally extinguished by the queen’s death in 1705.
No boundary between the two societies was specified in the letters patent. The boundary in 1608 rested on usage, and has since been adjusted by deed of partition (1732), by arbitration (in the 1870s), and by mutual agreements.
The Temple, though in London (unlike Gray’s Inn and Lincoln’s Inn, which were in Middlesex), has always been outside the jurisdiction of the city. On two unseemly occasions, in 1555 and 1669, when the lord mayor improperly entered the Inner Temple with his swordbearer (a right exercised only in the city), younger members of the society attempted forcibly to pull down the sword. The Inner Temple remains to this day a separate local authority.
Next chapter: Temple Church
Back to: The Inn’s Officers and Employees
